أدخل كلمة أو عبارة بأي لغة 👆
اللغة:
ترجمة وتحليل الكلمات عن طريق الذكاء الاصطناعي ChatGPT
في هذه الصفحة يمكنك الحصول على تحليل مفصل لكلمة أو عبارة باستخدام أفضل تقنيات الذكاء الاصطناعي المتوفرة اليوم:
- كيف يتم استخدام الكلمة في اللغة
- تردد الكلمة
- ما إذا كانت الكلمة تستخدم في كثير من الأحيان في اللغة المنطوقة أو المكتوبة
- خيارات الترجمة إلى الروسية أو الإسبانية، على التوالي
- أمثلة على استخدام الكلمة (عدة عبارات مع الترجمة)
- أصل الكلمة
%ما هو (من)٪ 1 - تعريف
ACTION TO RESTRAIN WRONGFUL ACTS WHICH ARE THREATENED OR IMMINENT
Quia timet injunctions in English law
Quia timet
(; ) is an injunction to restrain wrongful acts which are threatened or imminent but have not yet commenced. Fletcher v.
Credo quia absurdum
LATIN PHRASE EXPRESSING FIDEISM
Credo quia absurdum est; I believe because it is absurd
Credo quia absurdum is a Latin phrase that means "I believe because it is absurd", originally misattributed to Tertullian in his De Carne Christi. It is believed to be a paraphrasing of Tertullian's "prorsus credibile est, quia ineptum est" which means "It is completely credible because it is unsuitable", or "certum est, quia impossibile" which means "It is certain because it is impossible".
Quia propter
Quia propter (Latin: "Wherefore by…") was a document issued by the Fourth Lateran Council in 1215 on the subject of papal elections. It recognized three processes for unanimous agreement: "acclamation", "scrutiny" (balloting), and "compromissum" (compromise committee).
ويكيبيديا
Quia timet
Quia timet (Latin for 'because he fears'; pronounced [/ˈkwiːə ˈtɪmɛt/ or /ˈkwiə ˈtɪmᵻt/]), is a common law injunction to restrain wrongful acts which are threatened or imminent but have not yet commenced. The 1884 English legal case of Fletcher v. Bealey [28 Ch.D. 688 at p. 698] stated the necessary conditions for the equity courts to grant an injunction in such cases:
- proof of imminent danger;
- proof that the threatened injury will be practically irreparable; and
- proof that whenever the injurious circumstances ensue, it will be impossible to protect plaintiff's interests, if relief is denied.
